<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="css/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>网络法博客-瑞星“杀邮门”，该担何责？</title><link>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html</link><generator>RainbowSoft Studio Z-Blog 1.8 Spirit Build 80722</generator><language>zh-CN</language><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:23:46 +0800</pubDate><item><title>Re:瑞星“杀邮门”，该担何责？</title><author> (丫头)</author><link>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html#cmt59</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:56:08 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html#cmt59</guid><description><![CDATA[都是这样的，没办法，嫉妒心做怪啊，不过大家都是有自己的判断力的。]]></description></item><item><title>Re:瑞星“杀邮门”，该担何责？</title><author> (大海)</author><link>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html#cmt58</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:01:36 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html#cmt58</guid><description><![CDATA[瑞星是树大招风啊，出现过误杀的软件多了去了，也没见这么大反响啊，某些推波助澜的厂商辛苦了]]></description></item><item><title>Re:瑞星“杀邮门”，该担何责？</title><author>GTEE@126.COM (绕弯子)</author><link>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html#cmt41</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:39:50 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.netlawbbs.com/post/rising-kaka.html#cmt41</guid><description><![CDATA[希望某些人不要再拿卡卡事件当借口,借题炒作,混水摸鱼了.就到此为止吧,成吗？<br/>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
